RED MACHINE D

Passionate and Fiery

Wed, 22 Feb 2012 16:31:40 -0700

Passionate and Fiery

Photo

Wed, 22 Feb 2012 11:19:33 -0700

Photo

Wed, 22 Feb 2012 09:31:22 -0700

doctorwho: The Creation of River Song (Doctor Who + The...

Tue, 21 Feb 2012 12:12:12 -0700

doctorwho:

The Creation of River Song

(Doctor Who + The Powerpuff Girls crossover)

allllll-of-the-spectacular: and the grammy goes to...

Mon, 20 Feb 2012 22:41:10 -0700

allllll-of-the-spectacular:

and the grammy goes to spongebob

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QQFjsGOpBLs&t=34s

SUPERIOR SPONGEBOB TECHNO

theeverydaygoth: The noises I just made. I can’t even. Way to...

Mon, 20 Feb 2012 18:48:22 -0700

theeverydaygoth:

The noises I just made. I can’t even. Way to go with all the impossibly cute cat gifs lately, Tumblr.

thedailyshow: Don’t Bring This Sign People, you’re better than...

Mon, 20 Feb 2012 13:12:02 -0700

thedailyshow:

Don’t Bring This Sign

People, you’re better than this. Please don’t download this printable .PDF and take it to Rick Santorum’s 5:30 p.m. rally at Hope College. Or to his 7:30 p.m. dinner at the Amway Grand Plaza Hotel in Grand Rapids. That’s not who you are. Is it?

Photo

Mon, 20 Feb 2012 01:20:40 -0700

Am I allowed to use this word to describe myself?

Mon, 20 Feb 2012 00:02:24 -0700

iamateenagefeminist:

1. Has this word been used against a specific group of people in the past or is it being used against a specific group of people in the present?

If no then you are allowed to use that word to describe yourself.

If yes then move onto question two

2. Are you a part of the group the word has been used against?

If yes then you are allowed to use that word to describe yourself

If no then you are not allowed to use that word to describe yourself.

If “no, but!” move onto question three.

3. Are other people in the group the word has been used against telling you that you are not allowed to use that word?

If yes you should probably check your privilege and not use that word to describe yourself.

alright let’s throw the brakes on this shit post fucking haste

anyone saying you are allowed or not allowed to use a word, an idea, or a concept is a prick, and is trying to censor people

censorship is bad - no exceptions

You've seen the SNL "Taco Town" skit, right?

Sun, 19 Feb 2012 21:17:10 -0700

OH GOD THE TOTE BAG FILLING UP WITH SALSA

steadyrain: tsychotic: wolfpuke: Yes. YES! yes PLEASE...

Sun, 19 Feb 2012 21:00:48 -0700

steadyrain:

tsychotic:

wolfpuke:

Yes.

YES!

yes PLEASE PLEASE PLEASE OH PLEASE

YES

Sun, 19 Feb 2012 20:25:34 -0700

femmesandfamily: everythinginthrees: sex-positive-bitches: Kri...

Sun, 19 Feb 2012 18:56:35 -0700

femmesandfamily:

everythinginthrees:

sex-positive-bitches:

Kristen Stewart: smiling is not an obligation, professional or otherwise

”She stands out on the red carpet because she does not smile broadly or pose; she usually looks slightly uncomfortable. Of her red-carpet experience,Stewart said:
People say that I’m miserable all the time. It’s not that I’m miserable, it’s just that somebody’s yelling at me…I literally, sometimes, have to keep myself from crying…It’s a physical reaction to the energy that’s thrown at you.”

“Stewart is often a target of a specific kind of body policing: the “smile, baby” requirement. When she appears on the red carpet and does not assure us with her teeth that she is simply thrilled to be reduced to a presence, a dress, a posture, she is often the target of harassment for her expression. There is an expectation of women in general and famous woman in particular to always assure the onlooker that they are happy to be looked upon through smiling, and Stewart rejects this.”

Women are expected to be nice and sweet, to make other people feel comfortable. A woman who says ‘hey, I think there’s a problem here’ is being ‘negative.’ A woman who doesn’t smile while she’s being harassed is ‘humourless.’ A woman who prefers to stay focused on tasks is a ‘cold bitch.’ Significant gendering is involved here; women have an obligation to look and act a certain way and when they don’t, they need to be hassled until they do.

i have so much time for k stew

don’t fucking smile for anyone you don’t wanna

dont care if i dont like her, this is FUCKING REALNESS

she’s eschewed the obligatory smile for the look of “i just got a whiff of hot garbage” permanently welded to her head

allllll-of-the-spectacular: moriartyfixitforme: Empathy Testruprt: 0 - 32 = low (most people with...

Sun, 19 Feb 2012 12:47:34 -0700

allllll-of-the-spectacular:

moriartyfixitforme:

Empathy Test
ruprt:

0 - 32 = low (most people with Asperger Syndrome or high-functioning autism score about 20)
33 - 52 = average (most women score about 47 and most men score about 42)
53 - 63 is above average
64 - 80 is very high
80 is maximum

10

Your score: 50

Ok then.

59!

Send me a '★' if you actually like my blog. Takes a second, means a lot.

Sun, 19 Feb 2012 00:16:47 -0700

Photo

Sat, 18 Feb 2012 22:22:00 -0700

Photo

Sat, 18 Feb 2012 16:55:30 -0700

ryanjdavis: You can be fired in 29 states for being gay. Learn...

Sat, 18 Feb 2012 10:35:00 -0700

ryanjdavis:

You can be fired in 29 states for being gay. Learn more at GLAAD and stand up for Ellen.

you know, i just sent a message to riva about this, but i should probably just tell the lot of you

this is misleading

arizona is a right-to-work state, which essentially means that you can be fired for any reason, or for no reason at all

23 of the 29 states mentioned here are also right-to-work states

i would tell glaad about this, but i have a feeling they already know this and like every other activist organisation they are loath to correct their own statements to clear off the bullshit

instead, we could always start some bullshit of our own! “STATES WHERE IT IS LEGAL TO FIRE ELLEN JUST FOR DANCING BEFORE THE MONOLOGUE” “STATES WHERE IT IS LEGAL TO FIRE ELLEN JUST FOR CHANGING THE NAME OF HER SITCOM” “STATES WHERE IT IS LEGAL TO FIRE ELLEN JUST FOR HAVING A MANAGEABLE HAIRSTYLE”

or turn it around and use it in a more general sense! “STATES WHERE IT IS LEGAL TO FIRE SOMEONE JUST FOR PREFERRING DEEP SPACE 9 TO THE NEXT GENERATION” “STATES WHERE IT IS LEGAL TO FIRE SOMEONE JUST FOR USING IN-CANAL EARBUD HEADPHONES” “STATES WHERE IT IS LEGAL TO FIRE SOMEONE JUST FOR WASHING YOUR CAT BLANKET IN WARM WATER”

strangely (but not really) enough, all of those are just as true and less misleading than “STATES WHERE IT IS LEGAL TO FIRE ELLEN JUST FOR BEING GAY”

Photo

Sat, 18 Feb 2012 03:50:04 -0700

Fri, 17 Feb 2012 22:46:00 -0700